Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with normal renal function: iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar medium

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Barrett BJ and Parfrey PS (2006) Preventing nephropathy induced by contrast medium. N Engl J Med 354: 379–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aspelin P et al. (2003) Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 348: 491–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett BJ et al. (2006) Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol. Invest Radiol 41: 815–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jo SH et al. (2006) Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between Visipaque (iodixanol) and Hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 924–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pannu N et al. (2006) Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy. JAMA 295: 2765–2779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Chloë Harman, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author has received a consulting fee and speaker's honoraria from GE Medical.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, P. Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with normal renal function: iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar medium. Nat Rev Nephrol 3, 306–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0490

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation