Skip to main content
Log in

How useful is capsule endoscopy for the selection of patients for double-balloon enteroscopy?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Abstract

Although double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is useful for the diagnosis and management of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, the technique is fairly invasive, has several limitations, and can be associated with complications. It is, therefore, important to identify those patients who will benefit most from DBE, and those in whom the procedure should be avoided. In this Practice Point commentary, we discuss the findings and limitations of a retrospective study conducted by Hendel and colleagues that evaluated the utility of capsule endoscopy screening for the selection of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding who would benefit from DBE. The results suggest that capsule endoscopy screening is useful to predict the diagnostic yield of DBE, guide the route of DBE, influence sedation choices, and avoid the performance of unnecessary procedures. This commentary highlights the issues to consider when interpreting and generalizing these results in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Matsumoto T et al. (2005) Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis. Endoscopy 37: 827–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasha SF et al. (2008) Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 671–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hendel JW et al. (2008) Double-balloon endoscopy: who needs it? Scan J Gastroenterol 43: 363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis BS et al. (2005) A pooled analysis to evaluate results of capsule endoscopy trials. Endoscopy 37: 960–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaffes AJ et al. (2007) Clinical outcomes after double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding and a positive capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 66: 304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Concha R et al. (2007) Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 41: 242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones BH et al. (2005). Yield of repeat wireless video capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 1058–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A Leighton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SF Pasha declared no competing interests.

JA Leighton has received grant/research support from Given Imaging, Fujinon and Olympus. He is also a Consultant for Given Imaging.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasha, S., Leighton, J. How useful is capsule endoscopy for the selection of patients for double-balloon enteroscopy?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5, 490–491 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1201

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1201

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation