Skip to main content
Log in

What is the clinical validity of capsule endoscopy for evaluating the small bowel?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Eliakim R (2006) Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel (PillCam SB). Curr Opin Gastroenterol 22: 124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang SJ and Haber GB (2004) Capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 14: 87–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pennazio M et al. (2004) Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 126: 643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones BH et al. (2005) Yield of repeat wireless video capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 1058–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khursheed N Jeejeebhoy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubcenco, E., Baker, J. & Jeejeebhoy, K. What is the clinical validity of capsule endoscopy for evaluating the small bowel?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 618–619 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0606

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0606

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation