Skip to main content
Log in

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or paracentesis for refractory ascites—which is best?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Arroyo V et al. (1996) Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology 23:164–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong F et al. (1995) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt: effects on hemodynamics and sodium homeostasis in cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Ann Intern Med 122: 816–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Salerno F et al. (2003) Humoral and cardiac effects of TIPS in cirrhotic patients with different 'effective' blood volume. Hepatology 38: 1370–1377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riggio O et al. (1996) Hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Incidence and risk factors. Dig Dis Sci 41: 578–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Montgomery A et al. (2005) MELD score as a predictor of early death in patients undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28: 307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Salerno.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salerno, F., Cazzaniga, M. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or paracentesis for refractory ascites—which is best?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 312–313 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0520

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0520

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation