Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: comparison of the specificity of first-line biochemical tests

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology & Metabolism

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Newell-Price J et al. (2006) Cushing's syndrome. Lancet 367: 1605–1617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnaldi G et al. (2003) Diagnosis and complications of Cushing's syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 5593–5602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Raff H and Findling JW (2003) A physiologic approach to diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med 138: 980–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nugent CA et al. (1964) Probability theory in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 24: 621–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Vicky Heath, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell-Price, J. Diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: comparison of the specificity of first-line biochemical tests. Nat Rev Endocrinol 4, 192–193 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0752

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0752

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation