Skip to main content
Log in

Solving the paradox of self blood-pressure measurement

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Moore CR et al. (1997) Confirmation or exclusion of stage I hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 29: 1109–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewington S et al. for the Prospective Studies Collaboration (2002) Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 360: 1903–1913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mengden T et al. (1998) Reliability of reporting self-measured blood pressure values by hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 11: 1413–1417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mancia G et al. (2007) 2007 ESH-ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 25: 1105–1187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Alexandra King, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, R. Solving the paradox of self blood-pressure measurement. Nat Rev Cardiol 5, 306–307 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1207

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1207

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation