Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Considering agriculture in IPCC assessments

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The treatment of agriculture has evolved over the lifetime of the IPCC, as tracked by the assessment reports. Efforts to quantify crop yield impacts and mitigation potentials have increased significantly, as has adaptation research. However, there remains a dearth of experimental and observational studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1: Schematics of the amount of coverage devoted to topics in each of the five IPCC assessment reports.
Figure 2: Estimates of total global mitigation potential in agriculture in each AR.

References

  1. FCCC/INFORMAL/84. 4 (UNFCCC, 1992).

  2. Wollenberg, E. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3859–3864 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rivera-Ferre, M. G. et al. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 869–892 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Challinor, A. J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 287–291 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision Working Paper No. 12–03 (Agricultural Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Porter, J. R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) Ch. 7 (IPCC, Cambridge. Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, P. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 11 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, P. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2285–2302 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bajželj, B. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 924–929 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tilman, D. & Clark, M. Nature 515, 518–522 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help of A. Challinor and J. Watson in accessing relevant data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, 34060, Cedex 02, France

    John R. Porter

  2. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, 2630, Denmark

    John R. Porter

  3. Climate Change Institute, The Australian National University, Canberra, 2601, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Mark Howden

  4. Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK

    Pete Smith

Authors
  1. John R. Porter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Howden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pete Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Porter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porter, J., Howden, M. & Smith, P. Considering agriculture in IPCC assessments. Nature Clim Change 7, 680–683 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3404

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3404

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation