A diverse range of approaches, including contributions based on national interest and local benefits of climate action, is needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. Now, research considers how equitable approaches may play a role.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Averchenkova, A., Stern, N. & Zenghelis, D. Taming the Beasts of “Burden Sharing”: An Analysis of Equitable Mitigation Actions and Approaches to 2030 Mitigation Pledges (Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, 2014).
Robiou du Pont, Y. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 38–43 10.1038/nclimate3186 (2016).
Stavins, R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 1001–1082 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report Ch. 2 (Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, 2014); http://go.nature.com/2hkoViY
Hamilton, K., Brahmbhatt, M., Bianco, N. & Liu, J. M. Co-benefits and Climate Action (World Resources Institute, 2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zenghelis, D. Equity and national mitigation. Nature Clim Change 7, 9–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3192
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3192
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris Agreement emissions pledges
Nature Communications (2018)