Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to 'Policy institutions and forest carbon'

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

  • 1 Altmetric

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weidema, B. Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Milà i Canals, L. et al. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12, 5–15 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finnveden, G. et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 1–21 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Helin, T., Sokka, L., Soimakallio, S., Pingoud, K. & Pajula, T. Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment — a review. GCB Bioenergy 5, 475–486 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marland, G. & Schlamadinger, B. Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 13, 389–397 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ximenes, F., George, B., Cowie, A., Williams, J. & Kelly, G. Greenhouse gas balance of native forests in New South Wales, Australia. Forests 3, 653–683 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamers, P., Junginger, M., Dymond, C. C. & Faaij, A. Damaged forests provide an opportunity to mitigate climate change. GCB Bioenergy 6, 44–60 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekvall, T. & Weidema, B. System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 9, 161–171 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bento, A. & Klotz, R. Climate policy decisions require policy-based lifecycle analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 5379–5387 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Plevin, R., Delucchi, M. & Creutzig, F. Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation benefits misleads policy makers. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 73–83 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weidema, B., Frees, N. & Nielsen, A.-M. Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 4, 48–56 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Earles J. & Halog, A. Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 445–453 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian National University, ANU College of Law, Canberra, 0200, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Andrew Macintosh

  2. Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Canberra, 0200, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Heather Keith & David Lindenmayer

Authors
  1. Andrew Macintosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather Keith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Lindenmayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Macintosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macintosh, A., Keith, H. & Lindenmayer, D. Reply to 'Policy institutions and forest carbon'. Nature Clim Change 6, 805–806 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3094

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3094

  • Springer Nature Limited

Search

Navigation