Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Different views ensure IPCC balance

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The accusation that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has produced a report that is biased by a conflict of interest is unfounded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Teske, S., et al. Energy Efficiency 4, 409–433 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC Review of the IPCC Processes and Procedures: Task Group on Conflict of Interest Policy – Background Paper IPCC-XXXIII/Doc. 11, Add.1. (IPCC, 2011).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ottmar Edenhofer is Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III, Chair Economics of Climate Change at the Technical University Berlin and Head of the Research Domain Sustainable Solutions at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,

    Ottmar Edenhofer

Authors
  1. Ottmar Edenhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ottmar Edenhofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edenhofer, O. Different views ensure IPCC balance. Nature Clim Change 1, 229–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1178

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1178

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation