Skip to main content
Log in

Tools, tricks and trade secrets: the challenges of disseminating methodology

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Chemical Biology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The broad range of techniques used in chemical biology presents many challenges in reporting, translating and implementing experimental knowledge. By taking advantage of some readily available solutions and instituting some new approaches, it should be possible to more effectively disseminate technological advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: A renewed focus on methodology.

References

  1. Min, D.H. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 717–723 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ong, S.E. & Mann, M. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 252–262 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aharoni, A. et al. Nat. Methods 3, 609–614 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Varadarajan, N. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6855–6860 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths, A.D. & Tawfik, D.S. Trends Biotechnol. 24, 395–402 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zanghellini, A. et al. Protein Sci. 15, 2785–2794 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blount, K.F. & Breaker, R.R. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1558–1564 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tucker, B.J. & Breaker, R.R. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 342–348 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellington, A.D. & Szostak, J.W. Nature 346, 818–822 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuerk, C. & Gold, L. Science 249, 505–510 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Buskirk, A.R. et al. Chem. Biol. 11, 1157–1163 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Werstuck, G. & Green, M.R. Science 282, 296–298 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, Q. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 612–613 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwimmer, L.J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14707–14712 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Otey, C.R. et al. PLoS Biol. 4, e112 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt-Dannert, C. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 750–753 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshikuni, Y. et al. Nature 440, 1078–1082 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patnaik, R. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 707–712 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinson, B.C. et al. Nature 435, 737–738 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonard, N.J. Tetrahedron 53, 2325–2355 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz, J.S. & Martin, B.R. Res. Policy 26, 1–18 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Melin, G. Res. Policy 29, 31–40 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sambrook, J. & Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank M. Trani, V. Conticello and D. Lynn for helpful discussions and critical review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, S. Tools, tricks and trade secrets: the challenges of disseminating methodology. Nat Chem Biol 3, 128–130 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio0307-128

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio0307-128

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation