Skip to main content
Log in

The nanny model for IDPs

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Chemical Biology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are subject to ubiquitin-independent degradation, a default and passive process. We describe here a model wherein a group of 'nanny' proteins function to protect newly synthesized IDPs from degradation by default, thereby insuring their maturation into important regulatory molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The nanny model.
Figure 2: Transcription inhibition by the nanny.
Figure 3: Explanation for IDP oscillations by the nanny model.

References

  1. Wright, P.E. & Dyson, H.J. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 321–331 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ward, J.J., Sodhi, J.S., McGuffin, L.J., Buxton, B.F. & Jones, D.T. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 635–645 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gsponer, J., Futschik, M.E., Teichmann, S.A. & Babu, M.M. Science 322, 1365–1368 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiti, F. & Dobson, C.M. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 333–366 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asher, G., Reuven, N. & Shaul, Y. Bioessays 28, 844–849 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsvetkov, P. et al. Proteins 70, 1357–1366 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425–479 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bloom, J. & Pagano, M. Cell Cycle 3, 138–140 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tofaris, G.K., Layfield, R. & Spillantini, M.G. FEBS Lett. 509, 22–26 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd, N.F. et al. Br. J. Cancer 89, 1672–1685 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsvetkov, P., Reuven, N. & Shaul, Y. Cell Death Differ. (in the press).

  12. Koshland, D.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 44, 98–104 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oldfield, C.J. et al. Biochemistry 44, 12454–12470 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tompa, P. & Fuxreiter, M. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 2–8 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bell, S., Klein, C., Muller, L., Hansen, S. & Buchner, J. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 917–927 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsvetkov, P., Reuven, N., Prives, C. & Shaul, Y. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 26234–26242 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ongkeko, W.M. et al. Curr. Biol. 9, 829–832 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fink, A.L. Physiol. Rev. 79, 425–449 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hegyi, H. & Tompa, P. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000017 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krappmann, D., Wulczyn, F.G. & Scheidereit, C. EMBO J. 15, 6716–6726 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O'Dea, E.L., Kearns, J.D. & Hoffmann, A. Mol. Cell 30, 632–641 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Errami, A. et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1519–1526 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu, Y. et al. Immunity 7, 653–665 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosef Shaul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsvetkov, P., Reuven, N. & Shaul, Y. The nanny model for IDPs. Nat Chem Biol 5, 778–781 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.233

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation