The communication of chemistry to wider society is difficult because of 'chemophobia', its inherent complexity and its lack of unifying grand themes. To engage with citizens about the benefits and related dangers of the field, chemists must improve their dialogue with broader sections of the public — but how?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Lazlo, P. in The Public Image of Chemistry (eds Schummer, J., Bensaude-Vincent, B. & van Tiggelen, B.) Ch. 12 (World Scientific, 2007).
Schummer, J., Bensaude-Vincent, B. & Van Tiggelen, B. (eds) in The Public Image of Chemistry 1–6 (World Scientific, 2007).
Bodmer, W. The Public Understanding of Science (Royal Society, 1985).
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology Science and Society (Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 2000).
Science in Society Action Plan (European Commission, 2002).
Ball, P. Nature 469, 26–28 (2011).
Ball, P. in The Public Image of Chemistry (eds Schummer, J., Bensaude-Vincent, B. & van Tiggelen, B.) Ch. 4 (World Scientific, 2007).
Eger, M. in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Science Writing (ed. McRae, M. W.) 186–213 (Univ. Georgia Press, 1993).
Miller, S. in Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication (ed. Hornig Priest, S.) 207–209 (Sage, 2010).
Nisbet, M. C. et al. Am. J. Bot. 96, 1767–1778 (2009).
Schummer, J. & Spector, T. I. in The Public Image of Chemistry (eds Schummer, J., Bensaude-Vincent, B. & van Tiggelen, B.) Ch. 9 (World Scientific, 2007).
Borchelt, R. E. in Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (eds Bucchi, M. & Trench, B.) Ch. 10 (Routledge, 2008).
Hoffmann, R. The Same and Not the Same (Columbia Univ. Press, 1995).
Radford, T. Nature 469, 445 (2011).
Science and Technology (European Commission, Special Eurobarometer 340, 2010).
National Science Board in Science and Engineering Indicators 2010 Ch. 7 (National Science Foundation, 2010).
Irwin, A. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (eds Bucchi, M. & Trench, B.) Ch. 14 (Routledge, 2008).
Kim, Y. M. Commun. Res. 36, 254–284 (2009).
Nisbet, M. C. in Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (eds Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B. & Schlosberg, D.) Part 7 (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).
Feldman, l. et al. in The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News (ed. Amarasingam, A) 25–46 (McFarland, 2011).
Fahy, D. et al. Journalism: Theor. Pract. Criticism (in the press).
Wolfe-Simon, F., Switzer Blum, J. & Kulp, T. R. et al. Science 332, 1163–1166 (2011).
Gamson, W. A. et al. Am. J. Sociol. 95, 1–37 (1989).
Ferree, M. W. et al. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).
Pidgeon, N. et al. Nature Nanotech. 4, 95–98 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartings, M., Fahy, D. Communicating chemistry for public engagement. Nature Chem 3, 674–677 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1094
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1094
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Korean consumers’ awareness of the risks of chemicals in daily consumer products
Environmental Sciences Europe (2019)
-
Chelation as a metaphor for the effective fight against chemophobia
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly (2019)
-
Impact of Secondary Students’ Content Knowledge on Their Communication Skills in Science
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (2018)
-
Analytical chemistry as a tool for suppressing chemophobia: an introduction to the 5E-principle
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly (2018)