Skip to main content
Log in

Are the current ontologies in biology good ontologies?

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The failure of many bio-ontologies to follow international standards for ontology design and description is hampering their application and threatens to restrict their future use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: MGED Ontology (a fragment).
Figure 2: An ontology repository.

References

  1. http://www.geneontology.org

  2. http://mged.sourceforge.net/ontologies/MGEDontology.php

  3. Sowa, J. Knowledge Representation. Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations (Brooks/Cole, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mizoguchi, R. New Generation Computing 22/2, 193–220 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUMO/index.html

  6. Schulze-Kremer, S. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 5, 272–275 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/

  8. http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MIAME/miame_mage-om.html

  9. http://www.daml.org

  10. http://psidev.sourceforge.net/gps/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soldatova, L., King, R. Are the current ontologies in biology good ontologies?. Nat Biotechnol 23, 1095–1098 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0905-1095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0905-1095

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation