Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empirical analysis of major stem cell patent cases: the role of universities

  • Patents
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A study of stem cell patent litigation sheds light on the current patent reform debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1: Litigated cases per year.

References

  1. Allison, J.R. et al. Geo. L.J. 92, 435–476 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parchomovsky, G. & Wagner, R.P. U. Pa. L. Rev. 154, 1–77 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heller, M. & Eisenberg R.S. Sci. 280, 698–701 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Azher, A. I. U. Pa. J. Int'l. Econ. L. 25, 383–421 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 110th Senate Judiciary Committee's Report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_reports&docid=f:sr259.pdf

  6. Federal Trade Commission. To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy (FTC, 2003).

  7. Merrill, S. et al. (eds.) A Patent System for the 21st Century (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Research Council. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation. Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Protemic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health (National Academies Press, 2006).

  9. Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351 (N.C. 2002).

  10. Whittemore v. Cutter, 29 F. Cas. 1120 1121 (C.C.D. Mass 1813).

  11. Cert. denied 123 S. Ct. 2639 (2003).

  12. Obama, B. Removing barriers to responsible scientific research involving human stem cells (The White House, 9 March, 2009) http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Removing-Barriers-to-Responsible-Scientific-Research-Involving-Human-Stem-cells/

  13. Bergman, K. & Graff, G.D. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 419–424 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. US Patent 5,352,605.

  15. US Patent 4,940,835.

  16. Walsh, J.P., Arora, A. & Cohen, W. in Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, (eds. Cohen W. & Merrill, S.) 285–340 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 35 USC 290, Notice of Patent Suits.

  18. http://www.uspto.gov/news/og/pindex.jsp

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge M. Conway who performed the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ann E. Mills and Patti M. Tereskerz are at the University of Virginia Center for Biomedical Ethics and Humanities, Program in Ethics and Policy in Health Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.,

    Ann E Mills & Patti M Tereskerz

Authors
  1. Ann E Mills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patti M Tereskerz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann E Mills.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.E.M. and P.T. have been consultants for the Biotechnology Industry Organization on the issue that is the subject of this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Tables 1–7 (PDF 143 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, A., Tereskerz, P. Empirical analysis of major stem cell patent cases: the role of universities. Nat Biotechnol 28, 325–328 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0410-325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0410-325

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation