Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two views of the emperor's new clones

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FDA Report Center for Veterinary Medicine. Animal Cloning. A Draft Risk Assessment (Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, 2006). <http://www.fda.gov/cvm/Documents/Cloning_Risk_Assessment.pdf>

  2. Pryce, J.E., Coffey, M.P. & Brotherstone, S. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2664–2671 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tian, X.C. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6261–6266 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shibata, M. et al. J. Reprod. Dev. 52, 583–590 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker, S.C. et al. Theriogenology 67, 178–184 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blelloch, R. et al. Stem Cells 24, 2007–2013 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Betts, D.H. et al. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 72, 461–470 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ortegon, H. et al. J. Theriogenology 67, 116–126 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Green, M.S. et al. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 4, 3–6 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajput, A.H. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 19, 103–107 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wills, C. & Green, D.R. Immunol. Rev. 143, 263–292 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang, S.-C. & Ko, W.-H. Plant Dis. 88, 580–588 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Research Council. Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2002). <http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084393/html/>

  14. Vermij, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1301–1302 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marvier, M. & Van Acker, R. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 93–100 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogel, G. Science 313, 1714 (2006).

  17. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology/The Mellman Group. Public Sentiment About Genetically Engineered Foods, 2006 Survey (The Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, November 2006). <http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/pew_agbiotech_public1106.pdf>

  18. ETC Group. Communique, 1–12 (2005).

  19. Freese, W. & Schubert, D. in Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, vol. 21 (ed. Harding, S.E.) 299–325 (Intercept Ltd, Andover, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Salk Institute, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, 92037, California, USA

    David Schubert

Authors
  1. David Schubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schubert, D. Two views of the emperor's new clones. Nat Biotechnol 25, 282–283 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0307-282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0307-282

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation