Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to Early-tier tests insufficient for GMO risk assessment

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Romeis, J., Meissle, M. & Bigler, F. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 63–71 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Romeis, J. et al. in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, 62–67 (International Society for Biosafety Research, Washington, DC, 2006). <http://www.isbr.info/isbgmo/docs/9th_isbgmo_program.pdf>

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson, R.K.D., Meyer, S.J., Wolf, A.T., Wolt, J.D. & Davis, P.M. Risk Analysis 26, 845–858 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raybould, A. in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, 47–51 (International Society for Biosafety Research, Washington, DC, 2006). http://www.isbr.info/isbgmo/docs/9th_isbgmo_program.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA 630/R-95-002F (Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 1998).

  6. European Commission. First Report on the Harmonisation of Risk Assessment Procedures—Part 1: The Report of the Scientific Steering Committee's Working Group on Harmonisation of Risk Assessment Procedures in the Scientific Committees Advising the European Commission in the Area of Human and Environmental Health (European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussels, 2000). <http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/ssc/out83_en.pdf>

  7. Hill, R.A. & Sendashonga, C. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2, 81–88 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sears, M. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11937–11942 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sears, M. in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, 140–144 (International Society for Biosafety Research, Washington, DC, 2006). <http://www.isbr.info/isbgmo/docs/9th_isbgmo_program.pdf>

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolt, J.D., Peterson, R.K.D., Bystrak, P. & Meade, T. Environ. Entomol. 32, 237– 246 (2003).

  11. Dively, G.P. et al. Environ. Entomol. 33, 1116–1125 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). EFSA J. 228, 1–14 (2005). <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/gmo/gmo_opinions/1046.html>

  13. Ludy, C. & Lang, A. Biol. Contr. 38, 314–324 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reply to Early-tier tests insufficient for GMO risk assessment. Nat Biotechnol 25, 36–37 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0107-36

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0107-36

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation