Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences that matter in cancer genomics

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 December 2013

This article has been updated

Correcting for mutational heterogeneity within and between tumor samples improves cancer genome analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1: Genomic integrity is affected by external agents, including ultraviolet radiation, cigarette smoke and viral infection.

Change history

  • 08 November 2013

    In the version of this article initially published, on p. 892, right column, 9 lines from the bottom, the number “27” was inadvertently set as superscript. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

  • 01 December 2013

    Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 892–893 (2013); doi:10.1038/nbt.2715; published online 8 October 2013; corrected after print 8 November 2013 In the version of this article initially published, on p. 892, right column, 9 lines from the bottom, the number “27” was inadvertently set as superscript. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Lawrence, M.S. et al. Nature 499, 214–218 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Nature 487, 330–337 (2012).

  3. Stephens, P.J. et al. Nature 486, 400–404 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Nature 455, 1061–1068 (2008).

  5. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Nature 490, 61–70 (2012).

  6. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 2059–2074 (2013).

  7. Welch, J.S. et al. Cell 150, 264–278 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, M.J. et al. Nature 486, 353–360 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Govindan, R. et al. Cell 150, 1121–1134 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, R.A. Am. Stat. 2, 2 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Li Ding & Michael C Wendl

  2. Department of Genetics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Li Ding & Michael C Wendl

  3. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Li Ding

  4. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Li Ding

  5. Department of Mathematics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Michael C Wendl

Authors
  1. Li Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael C Wendl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Ding.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, L., Wendl, M. Differences that matter in cancer genomics. Nat Biotechnol 31, 892–893 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2715

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2715

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation