Skip to main content
Log in

Safikhani et al. reply

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Consistency between drug sensitivity measures (AUC) across FIMM, CGP and CCLE.

References

  1. Mpindi, J. P. et al. Consistency in drug response profiling. Nature 540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature20171 (2016)

  2. Haibe-Kains, B. et al. Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. Nature 504, 389–393 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483, 570–575 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barretina, J. et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 483, 603–607 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pemovska, T. et al. Individualized systems medicine strategy to tailor treatments for patients with chemorefractory acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov . 3, 1416–1429 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haverty, P. M. et al. Reproducible pharmacogenomic profiling of cancer cell line panels. Nature 533, 333–337 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pozdeyev, N. et al. Integrating heterogeneous drug sensitivity data from cancer pharmacogenomic studies. Oncotarget http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10010 (2016)

  8. Bouhaddou, M. et al. Drug response consistency in CCLE and CGP. Nature 540, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature20580 (2016)

  9. Smirnov, P. et al. PharmacoGx: an R package for analysis of large pharmacogenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 1244–1246 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Safikhani, Z. et al. Revisiting inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. F1000Research http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9611.1 (2016)

  11. Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J. & Hovig, E. Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003285 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figure 1 and additional references. (PDF 305 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

This file shows drug dose-response curves from the FIMM dataset. When the same drug was tested on the same cell line in CGP and/or CCLE, the curves were also displayed for comparison. (PDF 1564 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safikhani, Z., El-Hachem, N., Smirnov, P. et al. Safikhani et al. reply. Nature 540, E6–E8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20172

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20172

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation