Skip to main content
Log in

New cosmogenic burial ages for Sterkfontein Member 2 Australopithecus and Member 5 Oldowan

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The cave infills at Sterkfontein contain one of the richest assemblages of Australopithecus fossils in the world, including the nearly complete skeleton StW 573 (‘Little Foot’)1,2,3,4 in its lower section, as well as early stone tools5,6,7 in higher sections. However, the chronology of the site remains controversial8,9,10,11,12,13,14 owing to the complex history of cave infilling. Much of the existing chronology based on uranium–lead dating10,11 and palaeomagnetic stratigraphy8,12 has recently been called into question by the recognition that dated flowstones fill cavities formed within previously cemented breccias and therefore do not form a stratigraphic sequence4,14. Earlier dating with cosmogenic nuclides9 suffered a high degree of uncertainty and has been questioned on grounds of sediment reworking10,11,13. Here we use isochron burial dating with cosmogenic aluminium-26 and beryllium-10 to show that the breccia containing StW 573 did not undergo significant reworking, and that it was deposited 3.67 ± 0.16 million years ago, far earlier than the 2.2 million year flowstones found within it10,11. The skeleton is thus coeval with early Australopithecus afarensis in eastern Africa15,16. We also date the earliest stone tools at Sterkfontein to 2.18 ± 0.21 million years ago, placing them in the Oldowan at a time similar to that found elsewhere in South Africa at Swartkans17 and Wonderwerk18.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Stratigraphy and sample locations.
Figure 2: Skull of StW 573 (‘Little Foot’).
Figure 3: Burial dating isochron.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarke, R. J. & Tobias, P. V. Sterkfontein member 2 foot bones of the oldest South African hominid. Science 269, 521–524 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke, R. J. First ever discovery of a skull and well preserved skeleton of Australopithecus. S. Afr. J. Sci. 94, 460–463 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, R. J. Newly revealed information on the Sterkfontein Member 2 Australopithecus skeleton. S. Afr. J. Sci. 98, 523–526 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, R. J. A deeper understanding of the stratigraphy of Sterkfontein fossil hominid site. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 61, 111–120 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuman, K. The archaeology of Sterkfontein: past and present. J. Hum. Evol. 27, 471–495 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuman, K. & Clarke, R. J. Stratigraphy, artefact industries, and hominid associations for Sterkfontein Member 5. J. Hum. Evol. 38, 827–847 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuman, K. & Field, A. S. in The Cutting Edge: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins (eds Schick, K. & Toth, T. ) 151–169 (Stone Age Institute Press, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Partridge, T. C., Shaw, J., Heslop, D. & Clarke, R. J. The new hominid skeleton from Sterkfontein, South Africa: age and preliminary assessment. J. Quat. Sci. 14, 293–298 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Partridge, T. C., Granger, D. E., Caffee, M. W. & Clarke, R. J. Lower Pliocene hominid remains from Sterkfontein. Science 300, 607–612 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, J., Cliff, R. A. & Latham, A. G. U-Pb isotopic age of the StW 573 hominid from Sterkfontein, South Africa. Science 314, 1592–1594 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pickering, R. & Kramers, J. D. Re-appraisal of the stratigraphy and determination of new U-Pb dates for the Sterkfontein hominin site, South Africa. J. Hum. Evol. 59, 70–86 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herries, A. I. R. & Shaw, J. Paleomagnetic analysis of the Sterkfontein paleocave deposits: implications for the age of the hominin fossils and stone tool industries. J. Hum. Evol. 60, 523–539 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herries, A. I. R. et al. in The Paleobiology of Australopithecus (eds Reed, K. E., Fleagle, J. G. & Leakey, R. E. ) 21–40 (Springer, 2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruxelles, L., Clarke, R. J., Maire, R., Ortega, R. & Stratford, D. Stratigraphic analysis of the Sterkfontein StW 573 Australopithecus skeleton and implications for its age. J. Hum. Evol. 70, 36–48 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Drake, R. & Curtis, G. H. in Laetoli: A Pliocene Site in Northern Tanzania (eds Leakey, M. D. & Harris, J. M. ) 48–52 (Clarendon, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haile-Selassie, Y. et al. An early Australopithecus afarensis postcranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12121–12126 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibbon, R. J. et al. Cosmogenic nuclide burial dating of hominin-bearing Pleistocene cave deposits at Swartkrans, South Africa. Quat. Geochronol. 24, 10–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chazan, M. D. et al. The Oldowan horizon in Wonderwerk Cave (South Africa): archaeological, geological, paleontological, and paleoclimatic evidence. J. Hum. Evol. 63, 859–866 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Partridge, T. C. Re-appraisal of lithostratigraphy of Sterkfontein hominid site. Nature 275, 282–287 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Partridge, T. C. & Watt, I. B. The stratigraphy of the Sterkfontein hominid deposit and its relationship to the underground cave system. Palaeontol. Afr. 28, 35–40 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pickering, T. R., Clarke, R. J. & Heaton, J. L. The context of StW 573, an early hominid skull and skeleton from Sterkfontein Member 2: taphonomy and paleoenvironment. J. Hum. Evol. 46, 277–295 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarke, R. J. in Integrative Paths to the Past: Essays in Honor of F. Clark Howell (eds Corruccini, R. S. & Ciochon, R. L. ) 205–222 (Prentice Hall, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dart, R. A. The Makapansgat proto-human Australopithecus prometheus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 6, 259–284 (1948)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Granger, D. E. in Treatise on Geochemistry 2nd edn (eds Holland, H. D. & Turekian, K. K. ) Vol. 14 81–97 (Elsevier, 2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Balco, G. & Rovey, C. W. An isochron method for cosmogenic-nuclide dating of buried soils and sediments. Am. J. Sci. 308, 1083–1114 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Erlanger, E. D., Granger, D. E. & Gibbon, R. J. Rock uplift rates in South Africa from isochron burial dating of fluvial and marine terraces. Geology 40, 1019–1022 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Balco, G., Soreghan, G. S., Sweet, D. E., Marra, K. R. & Bierman, P. R. Cosmogenic-nuclide burial ages for Pleistocene sedimentary fill in Unaweep Canyon, Colorado, USA. Quat. Geochronol. 18, 149–157 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishiizumi, K. Preparation of 26Al AMS standards. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 223, 388–392 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chmeleff, J., von Blanckenburg, F., Kossert, K. & Jakob, D. Determination of the 10Be half-life by multicollector ICP-MS and liquid scintillation counting. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 268, 192–199 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nishiizumi, K. et al. Absolute calibration of 10Be AMS standards. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 258, 403–413 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work results from a collaboration begun with T. C. Partridge (deceased). AMS development and measurements were funded by National Science Foundation EAR1153689 to M.W.C. and D.E.G. and National Science Foundation EAR0844151 to D.E.G. Major funding to R.J.G., K.K. and R.J.C. was received from the Palaeontological Scientific Trust (PAST), which has supported research at Sterkfontein for 20 years. R.J.G. received bursary support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. K.K. thanks the NRF (SA) for substantial funding (AOP 1207112551-82611 and AOP1207173196-82591) and Prof. Bruce Rubidge of the Evolutionary Studies Institute for additional support. Figure 1 includes modified material from J. Hum Evol. vol. 70, Bruxelles L. et al., Stratigraphic analysis of the Sterkfontein StW 573 Australopithecus skeleton and implications for its age, 36–48 (2014), with permission from Elsevier.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.E.G. and R.J.G. conceived the project and performed laboratory work and data analysis. K.K. and R.J.C. supervised sample collection and interpretation of the dates. L.B. was responsible for mapping and interpretation of Member 2. M.W.C. supervised AMS measurements and methods development. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darryl E. Granger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Hand-picked samples.

Dark-coloured and light-coloured grains separated for samples M2 Dark and M2 Light. Each dish contains grains from the labelled original sample; M2 lower is sample ST 1, and M2 middle is ST 2. Light-coloured angular clasts in the top two dishes were combined into sample M2 Light, while the iron-stained and rounded clasts in the remaining dishes were combined into sample M2 Dark.

Extended Data Figure 2 Manuport.

Quartz manuport analysed from the Oldowan Infill. Maximum dimension is 67 mm. Sample recovered from Square Q57 spit 27′ 8′′–28′ 8′′.

Extended Data Table 1 Burial ages for Oldowan manuport

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Granger, D., Gibbon, R., Kuman, K. et al. New cosmogenic burial ages for Sterkfontein Member 2 Australopithecus and Member 5 Oldowan. Nature 522, 85–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14268

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation