Skip to main content
Log in

Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205; Nowak et al. reply

Nowak et al.1 argue that inclusive fitness theory has been of little value in explaining the natural world, and that it has led to negligible progress in explaining the evolution of eusociality. However, we believe that their arguments are based upon a misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a misrepresentation of the empirical literature. We will focus our comments on three general issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228, 1218–1220 (1970)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grafen, A. Optimisation of inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 238, 541–563 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, S. A. Foundations of Social Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Barton, N. H. The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. Am. Nat. 169, 207–226 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rousset, F. Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Queller, D. C. A general model for kin selection. Evolution 46, 376–380 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach 4th edn (Blackwell Scientific, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foster, K. R. A defense of sociobiology. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 74, 403–418 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Westneat, D. F. & Fox, C. W. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hardy, I. C. W. Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. West, S. A. Sex Allocation (Princeton Univ. Press, 2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Queller, D. C. & Strassmann, J. E. Kin selection and social insects. Bioscience 48, 165–175 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boomsma, J. J. Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 3191–3207 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ratnieks, F. L. W., Foster, K. R. & Wenseleers, T. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 581–608 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the planning, writing and/or revising of this paper. Several others who contributed significantly are not listed because they are named on separate comments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart A. West.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing financial interests: declared none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J. et al. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471, E1–E4 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09831

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation