Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Consider a compromise

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:
Lab Animal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Animal Welfare Act and Animal Welfare Regulations. 9 CFR.

  2. Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; amended 2002).

  3. Silverman, J., Suckow, M.A. & Murthy, S. The IACUC Handbook 3rd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin is Chief, Veterinary and Educational Services, Center for Animal Resources and Education,

    Mary E. Martin

  2. Bellezza is Senior IACUC Administrator, Office of Research Integrity and Assurance, at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.,

    Christine A. Bellezza

Authors
  1. Mary E. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine A. Bellezza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, M., Bellezza, C. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Consider a compromise. Lab Anim 44, 168–169 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.762

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.762

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation