Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic significance of p53 overexpression and mutation in colorectal adenocarcinomas

  • Experimental Oncology
  • Published:
British Journal of Cancer Submit manuscript

Abstract

The p53 tumour-suppressor gene is found altered in the majority of colorectal cancers. Lesions include allelic loss, mutation of the gene and overexpression of the p53 protein. All of these lesions have been analysed for prognostic significance, and whereas both mutation and allelic loss have been shown to be reasonably useful markers of prognosis, the utility of overexpression of the p53 protein is more ambiguous. Given that many authors use p53 overexpression as a marker for point mutation this issue is of some importance. We have therefore examined 100 colorectal carcinomas for mutation of the p53 gene, as well as overexpression of the p53 protein. Results show that whereas mutation of the p53 gene is associated with p53 overexpression, the degree of association depends, at least in part, upon the particular antibody used. Moreover, although mutation of the p53 gene does provide prognostic information, overexpression of the p53 protein, as detected with two antibodies, does not. These results suggest that immunohistochemistry is not a suitable alternative to direct detection of mutation in assessing prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D., Ji, CY. & Goh, HS. Prognostic significance of p53 overexpression and mutation in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 74, 216–223 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.340

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.340

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation