An event that initially resembled an ordinary supernova explosion continued to erupt brightly for more than 600 days. Standard theoretical models cannot explain the event's properties. See Letter p.210
Notes
References
Smartt, S. J. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 63–106 (2009).
Anderson, J. P. et al. Astrophys. J. 786, 67 (2014).
Arcavi, I. et al. Nature 551, 210–213 (2017).
Li, W., Wang, X. & Zhang, T. Astron. Telegr. 6898 (2015).
Sukhbold, T. & Woosley, S. E. Astrophys. J. 820, L38 (2016).
Woosley, S. E. Astrophys. J. 836, 244–279 (2017).
Abbott, B. P. et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woosley, S. The star that would not die. Nature 551, 173–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/551173a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/551173a
- Springer Nature Limited