Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Science in court: The fine print

  • News Feature
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A single incriminating fingerprint can land someone in jail. But, Laura Spinney finds, there is little empirical basis for such decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. A Review of the FBI's Handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case (Office of the Inspector General Oversight and Review Division, 2006).

  2. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (National Academies, 2009).

  3. Dror, I. E. & Charlton, D. J. Forensic Identification 56, 600-616 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leadbetter, M. Fingerprint Whorld 33, 231 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

See Editorial, page 325 ; Opinion, page 351 ; and online at www.nature.com/scienceincourt .

Laura Spinney is a freelance writer based in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Related links

Related links

Related external links

The Innocence Project

Itiel Dror's website

The Fingerprint Inquiry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spinney, L. Science in court: The fine print. Nature 464, 344–346 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/464344a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/464344a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation