It's simple to mop carbon dioxide out of the air, but it could cost a lot of money. In the second of three features on the carbon challenge, Nicola Jones talks with the scientists pursuing this strategy.
Change history
17 June 2009
The News Feature 'Sucking it up' ( Nature 458, 1094–1097; 2009) incorrectly stated that Global Thermostat is waiting for venture-capital funding to build a prototype for the capture of CO2 from the air. It already has sufficient funding in place. The News story 'Funding struggle for mercury monitoring' ( Nature 459, 620–621; 2009) erroneously located Changbai Mountain in Taiwan.
References
Pielke, R. A. Jr Environ. Sci. Pol. (in the press).
McKinsey & Company Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve (2009).
Keith, D. W., Ha-Duong, M. & Stolaroff, J. K. Climatic Change 74, 17–45 (2005)
Additional information
See also Editorial, page 1077, and www.nature.com/climatecrunch.
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
David Keith’s air capture work
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, N. Climate crunch: Sucking it up. Nature 458, 1094–1097 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/4581094a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4581094a
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Geoengineering: One cool solution
Nature (2013)
-
Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration
Nature Geoscience (2010)
-
Energy for air capture
Nature Geoscience (2009)