Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuroscience: Standard model

  • News Feature
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Questions raised about the use of 'ALS mice' are prompting a broad reappraisal of the way that drugs are tested in animal models of neurodegenerative disease. Jim Schnabel reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Benatar, M. Neurobiol. Dis. 26, 1–13 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon, P. H. et al. Lancet Neurol. 6, 1045–1053 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott, S. et al. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 9, 4–15 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu, S. et al. Nature 417, 74–78 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drachman, D. B. et al. Ann. Neurol. 52, 771–778 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann, M. et al. Science 314, 130–133 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, S.-H. et al. Nature 453, 921–924 (2008).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Jim Schnabel is a freelance writer based in Maryland.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Focus on Neurodegeneration

User’s Guide to the Mouse

Related external links

ALS Therapy Development Institute

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnabel, J. Neuroscience: Standard model. Nature 454, 682–685 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/454682a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/454682a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation