Forming the martian great divide

Kiefer, Walter S.

doi:10.1038/4531191a

Planetary science

Forming the martian great divide

News & Views
Published: 25 June 2008

Volume 453, pages 1191–1192, (2008)
Cite this article

From

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Walter S. Kiefer¹

632 Accesses
9 Citations
Explore all metrics

Early in its history, Mars suffered a convulsion that left a lasting geological and topographical scar. The latest work adds to evidence that the cause was external — a massive impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

**Figure 1: The martian hemispheric dichotomy.**

References

Watters, T. R., McGovern, P. J. & Irwin, R. P. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35, 621–652 (2007).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Neumann, G. A. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 109, E08002, 10.1029/2004JE002262 (2004).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Frey, H. V. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E08S91, 10.1029/2005JE002449 (2006).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Zhong, S. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 39, abstr. 1528 (2008).
ADS Google Scholar
Wilhelms, D. E. & Squyres, S. W. Nature 309, 138–140 (1984).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Roberts, J. H. & Zhong, S. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E06013, 10.1029/2005JE002668 (2006).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Andrews-Hanna, J. C., Zuber, M. T. & Banerdt, W. B. Nature 453, 1212–1215 (2008).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marinova, M. M., Aharonson, O. & Asphaug, E. Nature 453, 1216–1219 (2008).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nimmo, F., Hart, S. D., Korycansky, D. G. & Agnor, C. B. Nature 453, 1220–1223 (2008).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Phillips, R. J. et al. Science 291, 2587–2591 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McGovern, P. J. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 109, E07007, 10.1029/2004JE002286 (2004).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Kiefer, W. S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L22201, 10.1029/2005GL024260 (2005).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Karunatillake, S. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E03S05, 10.1029/2006JE002675 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Walter S. Kiefer is at the Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77058, USA. kiefer@lpi.usra.edu ,
Walter S. Kiefer

Authors

Walter S. Kiefer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

See Editorial, page 1143 . The researchers involved talk about this work and demonstrate the modelling behind it in this Nature video

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiefer, W. Forming the martian great divide. Nature 453, 1191–1192 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/4531191a

Download citation

Published: 25 June 2008
Issue Date: 26 June 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4531191a
Springer Nature Limited

Associated content

The Borealis basin and the origin of the martian crustal dichotomy

Letter Nature 26 June 2008
Implications of an impact origin for the martian hemispheric dichotomy

Letter Nature 26 June 2008
Mega-impact formation of the Mars hemispheric dichotomy

Letter Nature 26 June 2008

Editorial Summary

Cosmic cataclysms

A 'near Mars object' that got too near is a possible explanation for one of the most prominent features we see on Mars — the north-south dichotomy of the planet's surface appearance. The southern highlands on Mars cover about 60% of the planet and are heavily cratered, while the northern lowlands are lightly cratered, are geologically younger, and the underlying crust is significantly thinner than in the south. The two favoured explanations for this 'hemispheric dichotomy' are mantle convection and a giant impact, but there is little available evidence to distinguish between the theories. Three Letters in this issue provide support for the giant impact model. Marinova et al. present the results of dynamical simulations of dichotomy-forming impacts that demonstrate the feasibility of a giant impact origin. A snapshot of a simulation with favoured impact conditions is shown on the cover. The snapshot is about 30 min after impact and the colour codes for internal energy (Image: S. Lombeyda, Caltech Center for Advanced Computing Research; M. Marinova and O. Aharonson, California Institute of Technology). Andrews-Hanna et al. use the gravity and topography of Mars to map the dichotomy boundary beneath the large Tharsis volcanic province, and find the boundary to be elliptical, consistent with an oblique giant impact origin. This 'Borealis basin' would be the largest impact scar in the Solar System. Nimmo et al. use numerical modelling to simulate the effects of vertical impacts. They find that the impact model, as well as excavating a crustal cavity of the correct size, can explain the observed crustal disruption and the formation of the northern lowlands crust by impact-generated melt. In an accompanying News & Views, Walter Kiefer sums up the evidence for the impact model. Elsewhere in this issue, the results of a smaller but still enormous impact event are remembered. The Tunguska event laid waste to a large swath of forest to the north of Lake Baikal in Central Siberia on the morning of 30 June 1908. In a News Feature, Duncan Steel goes back to basics to sift through the contemporary evidence collected in the days after the blast. That, combined with modern studies of the area and theoretical work, points to a fragment of comet Encke as the likely impactor. A small group of astronomers began to look for near-Earth objects (NEOs) capable of causing Tunguska-like events in the 1960s and 1970s, and with the realization that an asteroid impact can cause events as drastic as mass extinctions, the Spaceguard project was begun in the 1998 to search more methodically for NEOs. As Alan Harris explains in a Commentary, the results of Spaceguard are encouraging. It looks like we are 'safe' for the foreseeable future, but NEO watchers say that we need to keep up our guard. Eric Hand reports on the giant lunar crater that holds the key to a catastrophic bombardment, and a Gallery Feature celebrates the beauty of impact craters from across the Solar System.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Forming the martian great divide

From

Access this article

References

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Search

Navigation