Skip to main content
Log in

Science degrees without the science

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Some UK universities offer science degrees in complementary medicine. David Colquhoun argues that these are not science but anti-science, and asks who is to blame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Colquhoun, D. DC's Improbable Science Page http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/quack.html.

  2. Barry, C. A. Soc. Sci. Med. 62, 2646–2657 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Editorial Lancet 336, 690 (2005).

  4. Holmes, O. W. Homeopathy and its Kindred Delusions http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/holmes.html (1842).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldacre, B. The Guardian 17 February (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.patrickholford.com/content.asp?id_Content=1778

  7. QAA Other Subjects Allied to Medicine http://www.qaa.ac.uk/reviews/reports/subjectlevel/q171_01.pdf (2000).

  8. Desmond, A. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform in Radical London (Univ. Chicago Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris, M. Universities and the NHS: Partners in Care http://bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/downloads/partnersincare.pdf (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to P. Williams of the QAA for information and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colquhoun, D. Science degrees without the science. Nature 446, 373–374 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/446373a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/446373a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation