Skip to main content
Log in

Psychophysics

reply: Putting plaids in perspective

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

When we look at Anderson's Fig. 1a, or at just about anything else, we see surfaces and boundaries, contours and intersections, edges and angles. These complex, interpreted image features might well be the stimulus elements that stereo mechanisms analyse to recover depth1,2,3,4. But are they?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogle, K. N. (1962) in The Eye, Vol. 4. Visual Optics and the Optical Space Sense (ed. Davson, H.) 271–324 (Academic, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, P. O. in The Neurosciences: Second Study Program (ed. Schmitt, F. O.) 471–485 (Rockefeller Univ. Press, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Chicago Univ. Press, 1971).

  4. Howard, I. P. Human Visual Orientation (Wiley, New York, 1982).

  5. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995).

  6. Farell, B. Nature 395, 689–693 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blakemore, C. & Hague, B. J. Physiol. 225, 437–455 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McKee, S. P., Bravo, M. J., Taylor, D. G. & Legge, G.E. Vision Res. 34, 1047–1060 (1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farell, B. reply: Putting plaids in perspective. Nature 401, 342–343 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/43822

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/43822

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation