Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scientists behaving badly

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

To protect the integrity of science, we must look beyond falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to a wider range of questionable research practices, argue Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson and Raymond de Vries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. OSTP Federal Policy on Research Misconduct http://www.ostp.gov/html/001207_3.html (2005).

  2. Teitelbaum, S. L. Nature 420, 739–740 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Korn, D. Nature 420, 739 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman, R., Weinstein, E., Marincola, E., Rosenbaum, J. & Solomon, F. Science 294, 2293–2294 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1992).

  6. Steneck, N. H. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Swazey, J. M., Anderson, M. S. & Louis, K. S. Am. Sci. 81, 542–553 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ranstam, J. et al. Control Clin. Trials 21, 415–427 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geggie, D. J. Med. Ethics 27, 344–346 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Asch, D. A., Jedrziewski, M. K. & Christakis, N. A. J. Clin Epidemiol. 50, 1129–1136 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1995).

  12. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1993).

  13. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Research on Research Integrity Program, an ORI/NIH collaboration, with financial support from the National Institute of Nursing Research and an NIH Mentored Research Scientist Award to R.d.V. We thank the three anonymous reviewers, Nick N. Steneck and M. Sheetz for their insightful input and responses to earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the HealthPartners Research Foundation, PO Box 1524 Mailstop 21111R, 8100 34th Avenue South, Minneapolis, 55440-1524, Minnesota, USA

    Brian C. Martinson

  2. the University of Minnesota, Educational Policy and Administration, 330 Wulling Hall, Minneapolis, 55455, Minnesota, USA

    Melissa S. Anderson

  3. the University of Minnesota, Center for Bioethics, N504 Boynton, Minneapolis, 55455, Minnesota, USA

    Raymond de Vries

Authors
  1. Brian C. Martinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melissa S. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raymond de Vries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinson, B., Anderson, M. & de Vries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435, 737–738 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation