Skip to main content
Log in

Allometry

How reliable is the biological time clock?

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Effect of temperature on mass-corrected development time.

References

  1. Gillooly, J. F., Charnov, E. L., West, G. B., Savage, V. M. & Brown, J. H. Nature 417, 70–73 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillooly, J. F. et al. Science 293, 2248–2251 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ludwig, D. Physiol. Zool. 1, 358–389 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bělehrádek, J. Protoplasma Monographien 8 (1935).

  5. Crozier, W. J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10, 461–464 (1924).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bělehrádek, J. Nature 118, 117–118 (1926).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heilbrunn, L. V. Science 62, 268–269 (1925).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bělehrádek, J. Nature 118, 478–480 (1926).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillooly, J. F. & Dodson, S. I. Freshwat. Biol. 44, 595–604 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ángel López-Urrutia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López-Urrutia, Á. How reliable is the biological time clock?. Nature 424, 269–270 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/424269a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/424269a

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation