Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seeing motion behind occluders

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE visual system has no difficulty maintaining the identity of an object as it disappears and reappears behind stationary occluders. In the natural world, a moving object may differ from occluders by many characteristics (colour, depth, shape and so on). Scene segmentation based on these characteristics is thought to happen early in visual processing, and to influence how objects, including moving objects, are identified1–5. What happens if the only characteristic distinguishing an object is its direction of motion? Experiments with random dot displays show that one dot moving in a constant trajectory is readily detected among identical dots in brownian motion6. Detection declines sharply if the trajectory is intermittently broken, but improves if occluders obscure the breaks in the trajectory. It is not sufficient that these occluders be perceived as segmented from the rest of the display (such as by colour or depth). Rather, it is critical that the occluders do not contain motion that is similar in direction to that of the target trajectory. We conclude that detection of the trajectory is due to the integration of information within a network of low-level motion detectors and is not dependent on segmentation processes7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakayama, K. & Shimojo, S. Vision Res. 30, 1811–1825 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimojo, S., Silverman, G. H. & Nakayama, K. Nature 333, 265–268 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. He, Z. L. & Nakayama, K. Nature 367, 173–175 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. He, Z. L. & Nakayama, K. Nature 359, 231–233 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braddick, O. J. Nature 333, 803–804 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watamaniuk, S. N. J., McKee, S. P. & Grzywacz, N. M. Vision Res. 35, 65–77 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuille, A. L. & Grzywacz, N. M. Nature 333, 71–74 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grzywacz, N. M., Smith, J. A. & Yuille, A. L. in The Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion 148–155 (IEEE Computer Society, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Grzywacz, N. M., Watamaniuk, S. N. J. & McKee, S. P. Vision Res. 325 (in the press).

  10. Shipley, T. F. & Kellman, P. J. Spatial Vis. 7, 323–339 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowne, S. F., McKee, S. P. & Glaser, D. A. J. opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1112–1121 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Scott N. J. Watamaniuk

    Present address: Psychology Department, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, 45435, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2232 Webster Street, San Francisco, California, 94115, USA

    Scott N. J. Watamaniuk & Suzanne P. McKee

Authors
  1. Scott N. J. Watamaniuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suzanne P. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watamaniuk, S., McKee, S. Seeing motion behind occluders. Nature 377, 729–730 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377729a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377729a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation