Skip to main content
Log in

Crossover from creep to inertial motion in friction dynamics

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

FRICTION between dry surfaces plays a role in solid dynamics over a wide range of length scales, from the mechanics of micromachines to earthquakes. Some common features of frictional dynamics have been observed for rather different materials, such as rock sliding on rock or metal on metal1,2. But there is still relatively little understanding of the way in which frictional motion varies generically with mechanical parameters. Here we present the results of experiments on frictional sliding of Bristol board, which show how the characteristics of frictional sliding depend on mass, driving velocity and stiffness of the driving spring constant. In general, there is a bifurcation from stick–slip to steady sliding with increasing velocity. The character of the frictional motion and of the associated bifurcation changes with velocity: at low speeds creep is dominant, which can be ascribed a characteristic length, whereas at high speeds the motion can be described as inertial, with a characteristic timescale. The kinetic friction coefficient decreases with increasing velocity in the former case, and increases with velocity in the latter. We anticipate that these results are likely to be generic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rabinowicz, E. Friction and Wear of Materials (Wiley, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scholz, C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Ch 2 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowden, F. P. & Tabor, D. The Friction and Lubrication of Solids Ch 5 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1950).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Oden, J. T. & Martins, J. A. C. Comp. Math. appl. mech. Engng. 52, 527–634 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeager, H. M. & Nagel, S. R. Science 255, 1523–1531 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshizawa, H., McGuiggan, P. & Israelachvili, J. Science 259, 1305–1308 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brace, W. F. & Byerlee, J. D. Science 15, 990–992 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, E. A. Perspectives of Nonlinear Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dieterich, J. H. J. geophys. Res. 84, 2161–2168 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rice, J. R. & Ruina,, A. L. J. appl. Mech. 50, 343–349 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu, Y. & Wong, T.-F. in Rock Mechanics Proc. 33rd US Symp. (eds Tillerson, J. R. and Wawersik, W. R.) 151–158 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rice, J. R. J. geophys. Res. 98, 9885–9907 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marone, C. & Kilgore, B. Nature 362, 618–621 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baumberger, T., Heslot, F. & Perrin, B. Crossover from creep to inertial motion in friction dynamics. Nature 367, 544–546 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/367544a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/367544a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation