Abstract
THE dating of the history of reversals of the Earth's magnetic field since the Jurassic period has been based primarily on radiometric dating of a small number of reversals, with most ages of individual reversals interpolated or extrapolated on the basis of the widths of marine magnetic anomalies. Recently, however, Pliocene and Pleistocene reversals have been dated by an entirely independent method, which relies on correlating climate proxies (such as oxygen isotope ratios) in sediments with calculated variations of the Earth's orbit and inclination1–4. The dates obtained from this astronomical calibration are ∼3–8% older than radiometrically calibrated ages published between 1979 and 1989 (see, for example, refs 5 and 6), although recent dating by the 40Ar/39Ar method tends to confirm the astronomical calibration7–10, at least for the past 3.3 Myr. Here I use sea-floor spreading rates determined from high-precision plate-rotation solutions for five plate pairs to test the astronomically calibrated timescale over the past 5.32 Myr. The results suggest that the errors in the astronomical calibration are no greater than 0.02 Myr, and also show that spreading rate can remain constant for several million years, even for fast-moving plates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnson, R. G. Quat. Res. 17, 135–147 (1982).
Shackleton, N. J., Berger, A. & Peltier, W. R. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 81, 251–261 (1990).
Hilgen, F. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 104, 226–244 (1991).
Hilgen, F. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 107, 349–368 (1991).
Mankinen, E. A. & Dalrymple, G. B. J. geophys. Res. 84, 615–626 (1979).
Harland, W. B. et al. A Geologic Time Scale 1989 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).
Baksi, A. K., Hsu, V., McWilliams, M. O. & Farrar, E. Science 256, 356–357 (1992).
Spell, T. L. & McDougall, I. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1181–1184 (1992).
Tauxe, L., Deino, A. D., Behrensmeyer, A. K. & Potts, R. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 109, 561–572 (1992).
McDougall, I., Brown, F. H., Cerling, T. E. & Hillhouse, J. W. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2349–2352 (1992).
Wilson, D. S. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).
Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13917–13951 (1992).
Chang, T. J. Am. statist Ass. 83, 1178–1183 (1988).
Klitgord, K. D., Huestis, S. P., Mudie, J. D. & Parker, R. L. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 387–424 (1975).
DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. & Stein, S. Geophys. J. Int. 101, 425–478 (1990).
Forsyth, D. & Uyeda, S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 163–200 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, D. Confirmation of the astronomical calibration of the magnetic polarity timescale from sea-floor spreading rates. Nature 364, 788–790 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/364788a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/364788a0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
50th anniversary review of the Mediterranean desiccation hypothesis
La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (2023)
-
Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis
Nature (1999)
-
Evolution of the East Pacific Rise at 16�?19� S since 5 Ma: Bisection of overlapping spreading centers by new, rapidly propagating ridge segments
Marine Geophysical Researches (1996)
-
High-resolution plate reconstruction of the southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge
Marine Geophysical Researches (1995)
-
Steadying the rates
Nature (1994)