Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social contracts in wasp societies

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE stability of social groups requires that conflicts among group members somehow be resolved. Recent models predict that sub-ordinates may be allowed limited reproduction by dominant colony-mates as an inducement to stay and aid dominants1– For such 'social contracts' to be evolutionarily stable, attempted reproductive cheating by dominants must be punishable3. In the eusocial paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus, subordinate queens that co-found nests with dominant queens usually disappear after the first workers emerge, so subordinates lay most of their reproductive-destined eggs just before worker emergence. Thus subordinates should be very sensitive to reproductive cheating during the latter period but relatively insensitive when worker-destined eggs are laid. Here we find in a series of egg-removal experiments designed to mimic egg-eating that subordinates do not change their aggressiveness when worker-destined eggs are removed, but that they greatly increase their aggression when reproductive-destined eggs are removed, especially when the queens are of similar size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vehrencamp, S. L. Am. Zool. 23, 327–335 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reeve, H. K. in The Social Biology of Wasps (eds Ross, K. & Matthews, R.) 99–148 (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reeve, H. K. & Ratnieks, F. L. in Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (ed. Keller, L.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, in the press).

  4. West-Eberhard, M. J. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 140, 1–101 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noonan, K. M. in Natural Section and Social Behavior (eds Alexander, R. D. & Tinkle, D. W.) 18–44 (Chiron, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Metcalf, R. A. Am. Nat. 116, 642–654 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Metcalf, R. A. & Whitt, G. S. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 339–351 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamboa, G. X. Heacock, B. D. & Wiltjer, S. J. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 51, 343–352 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fistiwild, T. G. & Gamboa, G. J. Anim. Behav. 43, 95–102 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfennig, D. W. & Klahn, J. E. Z. Tierpsychol. 67, 198–203 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klahn, J. E. thesis, Univ. Iowa (1981).

  12. Strassmann, J. E. Florida Entomol. 64, 74–88 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pardi, L. Physiol. Zool. 21, 1–13 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfennig, D. W., Reeve, H. K. & Shellman, J. S. Anim. Behav. 31, 412–416 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pfennig, D. W., Gamboa, G. J., Reeve, H. K., Shellman-Reeve, J. & Ferguson, I. D. Behavl. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13, 299–305 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reeve, H. K. & Gamboa, G. J. Behaviour 102, 147–167 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reeve, H. K. & Gamboa, G. J. Behavl. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13, 63–74 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeve, H., Nonacs, P. Social contracts in wasp societies. Nature 359, 823–825 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/359823a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/359823a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation