Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the structure of a receptor–protein complex using a binary docking method

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

TO validate procedures of rational drug design, it is important to develop computational methods that predict binding sites between a protein and a ligand molecule. Many small molecules have been tested using such programs, but examination of protein–protein and peptide–protein interactions has been sparse. We were able to test such applications once the structures of both the maltosebinding protein1 (MBP) and the ligand-binding domain of the aspartate receptor2, which binds MBP, became available. Here we predict the binding site of MBP to its receptor using a 'binary docking' technique in which two MBP octapeptide sequences containing mutations that eliminate maltose chemotaxis are independently docked to the receptor. The peptides in the docked solutions superimpose on their original positions in the structure of MBP and allow the formation of an MBP–receptor complex. The consistency of the computational and biological results supports this approach for predicting protein–protein and peptide–protein interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spurlino, J. C., Lu, G.-Y. & Quiocho, F. A. J. biol. Chem. 266 (8), 5202–5219 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Milburn, M. V. et al. Science 254, 1342–1347 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manson, M. D. & Kossmann, M. J. Bact. 165, 34–40 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kossmann, M., Wolff, C. & Manson, M. D. J. Bact. 170, 4516–4521 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardina, P., Conway, C., Kossman, M. & Manson, M. D. J. Bact. 174, 1528–1526 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodsell, D. & Olson, A. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 8, 195–202 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mowbray, S. L. & Koshland, D. E. Jr Cell 50, 171–180 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Falke, J. J. & Koshland, D. E. Jr Science 237, 1596–1600 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Milligan, D. & Koshland, D. E. Jr Science 254, 1651–1654 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. Jr & Vecchi, M. P. Science 220, 671–680 (1983).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gasteiger, J. & Marsili, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 34, 3181–3184 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodford, P. J. J. med. Chem. 28, 849–857 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoddard, B., Koshland, D. Prediction of the structure of a receptor–protein complex using a binary docking method. Nature 358, 774–776 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358774a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/358774a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation