Skip to main content
Log in

Were small galaxies once the dominant cosmological population?

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 18 June 1992

Abstract

DEEP sky surveys have turned up unexpectedly large numbers of faint blue galaxies1,2—three to five times more than would be estimated by extrapolation from the present galaxy population assuming no evolution. Unless distances to these faint galaxies are known, it is difficult to distinguish between luminosity evolution (in which case, galaxies in the past were systematically brighter) and density evolution (as, for example, if modern galaxies are the results of mergers of earlier ones). We have obtained redshifts and K magnitudes for a small but complete sample of 22 galaxies with B magnitude down to 24. In the luminosity range B = 23–24, the B-band galaxy counts are dominated by a population of small blue galaxies at z ≈ ~ 0.25, which may collectively contain as much baryonic matter as the normal galaxies. It is possible either that these earlier galaxies have undergone merging3 to create the present galaxy population, or that they represent a quite different galactic population which has now faded or disappeared4. Either possibility has considerable implications for our understanding of galaxy formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tyson, J. A. Astr. J. 96, 1–23 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lilly, S. J., Cowie, L. L. & Gardner, J. P. Astrophys. J. 369, 79–105 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guiderdoni, B. & Rocca-Volmerange, B. Astr. Astrophys. 227, 362–378 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowie, L. L., Phys. Script. T36, 102–107 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshii, Y. & Takahara, F. Astrophys. J. 326, 1–18 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maddox, S. J., Sutherland, W. J., Efstathiou, G., Loveday, J. & Peterson, B. A. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 247, 1–5P (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukugita, M., Takahara, F., Yamashita, K. & Yoshii, Y. Astrophys. J. 361, L1–4 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fransson, C. & Epstein, R. Mon. Not. R. astr Soc. 198, 1127–1141 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dekel, A. & Silk, J. Astrophys. J. 303, 39–55 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Broadhurst, T. J., Ellis, R. S. & Shanks, T. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 235, 827–856 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Colless, M. M., Ellis, R. S., Taylor, K. & Hook, R. N. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 244, 408–423 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshii, Y. & Takahara, F. Astrophys. J. 346, 28–33 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cowie, L. L., Gardner, J. P., Hu, E. M., Wainscoat, R. & Hodapp, K. W. Astrophys. J. (submitted).

  14. Songaila, A., Cowie, L. L. & Lilly, S. J. Astrophys. J. 348, 371–377 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ostriker, J. P. in The Evolution of the Universe of Galaxies (ed. Kron, R. G.) 25–29 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neuschaefer, L., Windhorst, R. A. & Dressler, A. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  17. Efstathiou, G. et al. Astrophys. J. 380, L47 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowie, L., Songaila, A. & Hu, E. Were small galaxies once the dominant cosmological population?. Nature 354, 460–461 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/354460a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/354460a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation