These are exciting times in the study of human origins. But excitement needs to be tempered with caution in assessing the claim of a six-million-year-old direct ancestor of modern humans.
References
Senut, B. et al. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 332, 137–144 (2001).
Pickford, M. & Senut, B. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 332, 145–152 (2001).
Balter, M. Science 291, 1460–1461 (2001).
Butler, D. Nature 410, 508–509 (2001).
White, T. D., Suwa, G. & Asfaw, B. Nature 371, 306–312 (1994).
Hill, A. in Late Cenozoic Environments and Hominin Evolution: A Tribute to Bill Bishop (eds Andrews, P. & Banham, P.) 85–97 (Geological Society, London, 1999).
Leakey, M. et al. Nature 410, 433–440 (2001).
Lieberman, D. E. Nature 410, 419–420 (2001).
Senut, B. S. Afr. J. Sci. 92, 165–166 (1996).
Ward, C., Leakey, M. & Walker, A. Evol. Anthropol. 7, 197–205 (1999).
Lague, M. R . & Jungers, W. L. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 101, 401–427 (1996).
Teaford, M. F. & Ungar, P. S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13506–13511 (2000).
Asfaw, B. Science 284, 629–635 (1999).
Collard, M. & Wood, B. A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5003–5006 (2000).
Wood, B. A. & Collard, M. Science 284, 65–71 (1999).
Pilbeam, D. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 5, 155–168 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aiello, L., Collard, M. Our newest oldest ancestor?. Nature 410, 526–527 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35069164
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35069164
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Return to the planet of the apes
Nature (2001)