Skip to main content
Log in

Psychology

An electoral butterfly effect

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Part of the controversy surrounding this year's presidential election in the United States concerns the potential for systematic bias in the ballot-card format — could the butterfly ballot used in Palm Beach County, Florida, have led to confusion and caused people who had intended to vote for Al Gore to vote for Pat Buchanan by mistake? Here we show that not only is the double-column butterfly ballot more confusing than a single-column ballot, but that it also appears to cause systematic errors in voting which call into question the validity of the results from Palm Beach County in the 2000 United States presidential election.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The arrangement of candidates on the butterfly ballot in a mock election for the Canadian prime minister.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Sinclair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinclair, R., Mark, M., Moore, S. et al. An electoral butterfly effect. Nature 408, 665–666 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35047160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35047160

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation