Skip to main content
Log in

Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

FEMALE choice of mates based on the expression of characters that correlate with male quality remains a controversial and largely untested idea1. By choosing quality males, females stand to gain resources2, genetic benefits for their offspring3–5, or both. In the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), male plumage coloration is a function of dietary intake of carotenoids6,7. Here I present results of field studies that indicate that females prefer to mate with colourful males and that plumage brightness correlates with a male's capactity for parental care and perhaps its genotypic quality. Artificially brightened males paired more quickly and frequently than sham control or lightened males. Among unmanipulated males, plumage coloration was correlated with nest attentiveness and overwinter survival. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the coloration of fathers and sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B. (eds) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (Wiley, New York, 1987).

  2. Hoelzer, G. A. Anim. Behav. 38, 1067–1078 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zahavi, A. J. theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson, M. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brush, A. H. & Power, D. M. Auk 93, 725–739 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hill, G. E. Auk (in the press).

  8. Gill, D. E. & Lanyon, W. E. Bird-Banding 36, 1–14 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill, G. E. Anim. Behav. 40, 563–572 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, W. L. Condor 62, 245–271 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Michener, H. & Michener, J. R. Condor 33, 12–19 (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergtoid, W. H. Auk 30, 40–73 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crespi, B. J. & Bookstein, F. L. Evolution 43, 18–29 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersson, M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17, 375–393 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dominey, W. J. J. theor. Biol. 101, 495–502 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J. H. Am. Nat. 124, 309–323 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nur, N. & Hasson, O. J. theor. Biol. 110, 275–297 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Endler, J. A. Evolution 34, 76–91 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Endler, J. A. Environ, biol. Fishes 9, 173–190 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodric-Brown, A. Behavl ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 199–205 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kodric-Brown, A. Behavl ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 393–401 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. Nature 344, 330–333 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, G. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350, 337–339 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/350337a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/350337a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation