Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Solar cycle relationship clouded by Neptune's sustained brightness maximum

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

FOR almost two decades, Neptune's brightness varied inversely, at the level of a few per cent, with the solar cycle. The anticorrela-tion was so striking that some causal mechanism seemed necessary, and several suggestions were made1,2. Two different but plausible ideas involving solar-induced global changes in Neptune's atmosphere were a cyclic darkening ('tanning') of stratospheric aerosols caused by varying ultraviolet radiation3 and a variation in the rate of ion-induced nucleation of atmospheric aerosols due to the modulation of galactic cosmic-ray flux by solar activity4. In 1990, with the current solar cycle near its peak, however, Neptune departed unexpectedly from the previous cyclic behaviour, attaining its greatest brightness since 1972. Further observations will be needed to decide if the present deviation signals a unique atmospheric phenomenon, and to see if the cyclic anticorrelation will be restored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lockwood, G. W. & Thompson, D. T. Nature 280, 43–45 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lockwood, G. W. & Thompson, D. T. Science 234, 1543–1545 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baines, K. H. & Smith, W. H. Icarus 85, 65–108 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moses, J. I., Allen, M. & Yung, Y. L. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 1489–1492 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lockwood, G. W. Icarus 32, 613–630 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lockwood, G. W. in Handbook of Solar System Photometry (ed. Genet, R.) 2-1–2-19 (Willmann-Bell, Richmond, Virginia, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joyce, R. R., Pilchec, C. B., Cruikshank, D. P. & Morrison, D. Astrophys. J. 214, 657–662 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pilcher, C. B. Astrophys. J. 214, 663–666 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lockwood, G. W., Thompson, D. T., Hammel, H. B., Birch, P. & Candy, M. Icarus (in the press).

  10. Lockwood, G. W., Thompson, D. T., Lutz, B. L. & Howell, E. S. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  11. Slavsky, D. & Smith, H. J. Astrophys. J. 226, L49–L52 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, B. A. in Uranus and Neptune (ed. Bergstralh, J. T.) 213–222 (NASA CP-2330, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waldrop, W. M. Science 250, 1201 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86001, USA

    G. W. Lockwood & D. T. Thompson

Authors
  1. G. W. Lockwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. T. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockwood, G., Thompson, D. Solar cycle relationship clouded by Neptune's sustained brightness maximum. Nature 349, 593–594 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/349593a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/349593a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation