Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE primate visual system is adept at identifying objects embedded within complex displays that contain a variety of potentially distracting elements. Theories of visual perception postulate that this ability depends on spatial selective attention, a mechanism analogous to a spotlight or zoom lens, which concentrates high-level processing resources on restricted portions of the visual field1,2. Previous studies in which attention was pre-cued to specific locations in the visual field have shown that the spotlight has a single, unified focus2,3, even in the disconnected hemispheres of patients who have undergone surgical transection of the corpus callosum4,5. Here we demonstrate that an independent focus of attention is deployed by each of the surgically separated hemispheres in a visual search task, such that bilateral stimulus arrays can be scanned at a faster rate by 'split-brain' subjects than by normal control subjects. The attentional system used for visual search therefore seems to be functionally and anatomically distinct from the system that mediates voluntary orienting of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. Cog. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksen, C. W. & Yeh, Y. Y. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 11, 583–597 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Posner, M. I. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 32, 3–25 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holtzman, J. D., Sidtis, J. J., Volpe, B. T., Wilson, D. H. & Gazzaniga, M. S. Brain 104, 861–872 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holtzman, J. D., Volpe, B. T. & Gazzaniga, M. S. in Varieties of Attention (eds Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. R.) 375–394 (Academic, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eglin, M., Robertson, L. C. & Knight, R. T. J. Cog. Neuroscl. (in the press).

  7. McLeod, P., Driver, J. & Crisp, J. Nature 332, 154–155 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakayama, K. & Silverman, G. H. Nature 320, 264–265 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellenberg, L. & Sperry, R. W. Neuropsychologia 18, 411–418 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sidtis, J. J., Volpe, B. T., Wilson, D. H., Rayport, M. & Gazzaniga, M.S. J. Neurosci. 1, 323–331 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bogen, J. E. & Vogel, P. J. in Les Syndromes de Disconnexion Calleuse Chez I'Homme (eds Michel, F. & Schott, B.) 227–251 (Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gazzaniga, M. S. Neuropsychologia 25, 119–133 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreuter, C., Kinsbourne, M. & Trevarthen, C. Neuropsychologia 10, 453–461 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teng, E. L. & Sperry, R. W. Neuropsychologia 11, 131–140 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewine, J. D. & Doty, R. W. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 14, 2 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Briand, K. A. & Klein, R. M. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 13, 228–241 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Treisman, A. M. Comput. vis. Graphics, Image Proc. 31, 156–177 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E., & Posner, M. I. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 12, 361–369 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gazzaniga, M. S. & Sperry, R. W. Psychon. Sci. 4, 261–262 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gazzaniga, M. S. & Young, E. D. Expl Brain Res. 3, 368–371 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holtzman, J. D. & Gazzaniga, M. S. Neuropsychologia 23, 315–321 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michael S. Gazzaniga: Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03756, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosciences, M-008, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093, USA

    Steven J. Luck, Steven A. Hillyard, George R. Mangun & Michael S. Gazzaniga

Authors
  1. Steven J. Luck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven A. Hillyard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George R. Mangun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael S. Gazzaniga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luck, S., Hillyard, S., Mangun, G. et al. Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature 342, 543–545 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/342543a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/342543a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation