Skip to main content
Log in

Direct evidence that growth cones pull

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THERE is controversy over whether axonal elongation is the result of a pulling growth cone and the role of tension in axonal elongationl-4. Earlier in this decade, the consensus was that axons or neurites elongated from tension generated by forward motility of the growth cone5,6. It was presumed that contractile filopodia were the source of the tension moving the growth cone7,8. But this view was challenged by experiments showing that neurites elongate, albeit abnormally, in the presence of cytochalasin, which inhibits growth-cone and filopodial movements9. Additionally, high resol-ution, video-enhanced observations of growth-cone activity argued against filopodial shortening as a source of tension, suggesting instead that an extrusion of cytoplasm rather than a pulling process, is the key event in neurite elongation1,3. Studies of slow axonal transport10, however, indicate that much slower cytoskeletal pushing underlies axonal elongation. We report here direct measurements of neurite force as a function of growth-cone advance which show that they are linearly related and accompanied by apparent neurite growth. No increase in force occurs in neurites whose growth cone fails to advance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aletta, J. M. & Greene, L. A. J. Neurosci. 8, 1425–1435 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, D. Trends Neurosci. 10, 431–434 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, D. J. & Burmeister, D. W. J. Cell Biol. 103, 1921–1931 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Letourneau, P. C., Shattuck, T. A. & Ressler, A. H. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 8, 193–209 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Landis, S. C. A. Rev. Physiol. 45, 567–580 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Letourneau, P. C. in: Neuronal Development (ed. Spitzer, N. C.) (Plenum, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bray, D. in: Cell Behavior (ed. Bellair, R., Curtis, A. & Dunn; G.) (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trinkaus, J. P. J. Neurosci. Res. 13, 1–19 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsh, L. & Letourneau, P. C. J. Cell Biol. 99, 2061–2067 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lasek, R. J. J. Cell Sci. suppl. 5, 161–179 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dennerll, T. J., Joshi H. C., Steel, V. L., Buxbaum, R. E. & Heidemann, S. R. J. Cell Biol. 107, 665–674 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, M. J., George, E. B. & Gilbert, L. J. Cell Motilil. 4, 351–370 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bray, D. Devl Biol. 102, 379–389 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spero, D. A. & Roisen, F. J. Devl Brain Res. 23, 155–159 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buxbaum, R. E. & Heidemann, S. R. J. theor. Biol. 134, 379–390 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bray, D. & White, J. G. Science 239, 883–888 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Forscher, P. & Smith, S. J. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1505–1516 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Neuron 1, 761–772 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baas, P. W. & Heidemann, S. R. J. Cell Biol. 103, 917–927 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoneda, M. J. exp. Biol. 37, 461–468 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamoureux, P., Buxbaum, R. & Heidemann, S. Direct evidence that growth cones pull. Nature 340, 159–162 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/340159a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/340159a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation