Skip to main content
Log in

Mate guarding as paternity insurance in Idaho ground squirrels

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

FOLLOWING a copulation, males in many species of vertebrates (particularly birds)1–4 and invertebrates5,6 remain near the inseminated female and repel other suitors with displays or force. Guarding males must delay resumption of competitive mate searching7, but they may insure their paternity by reducing possibilities for secondary matings and sperm competition8,9. Among mammals, post-copulatory mate guarding has been reported in rodents10–12, mongooses13, ungulates14,15 and primates16,17, including humans18, but the effects of such behaviour on male reproductive success have not been determined genetically. I report here that mate guarding by male Idaho ground squirrels (Spermophilus brunneus) enhances a male's probability of paternity. Furthermore, an analysis based on game theory shows that mate guarding is an evolutionarily stable strategy for male S. brunneus, but not male Belding's ground squirrels (S. beldingi), which resume searching once copulation is completed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkhead, T. R., Johnson, S. D. & Nettleship, D. N. Anim. Behav. 33, 608–619 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Møller, A. P. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 401–408 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson, S. K. Anim. Behav. 34, 241–255 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McKinney, F. in Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution (eds Rubenstein, D. I. & Wrangham, R. W.) 153–171 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Waage, J. K. in Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith, R. L.) 251–290 (Academic, Orlando, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Thornhill, R. & Alcock, J. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwagmeyer, P. L. & Parker, G. A. Anim. Behav. 35, 1015–1025 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker, G. A. in Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith, R. L.) 1–60 (Academic, Orlando, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Birkhead, T. R., Pellat, J. & Hunter, F. M. Nature 334, 60–62 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farentinos, R. C. Anim. Behav. 20, 316–326 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barash, D. P. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9, 187–193 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dobson, F. S. J. Mammal. 64, 218–225 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rood, J. P. Anim. Behav. 28, 143–150 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lott, D. F. Z. Tierpsychol. 56, 97–114 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hogg, J. T. Ethology 75, 119–144 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tutin, C. E. G. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6, 29–38 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bercovitch, F. B. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 163–172 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Flinn, M. V. Ethol. Sociobiol. 9, 1–28 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yensen, E. Unpubl. Rep. Idaho Dept. Fish & Game, 1–41 (1985).

  20. Hoogland, J. L. & Foltz, D. W. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 155–163 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Voss, R. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 689, 1–27 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S. H., Johnson, W. E. & Gentry, J. B. Stud Genetics, Univ. Texas Publ. 7103, 49–90 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. May, B. P., Wright, J. E. & Stoneking, M. J. Fish Res. Board Canada 36, 1114–1126 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dewsbury, D. A. in Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith, R. L.) 547–571 (Academic, Orlando, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Ginsberg, J. R. & Huck, U. W. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 74–79 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Foltz, D. W. & Hoogland, J. L. J. Mammal. 62, 706–712 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Loughry, W. J. Behaviour 103, 27–48 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwartz, O. A. & Armitage, K. B. Science 207, 665–667 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Armitage, K. B. in Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution (eds Rubenstein, D. I. & Wrangham, R. W.) 303–331 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sherman, P. W. thesis, Univ. Michigan (1976).

  31. Sherman, P. W. & Morton, M. L. Ecology 65, 1617–1628 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sherman, P. W. in Sociobiology: Beyond Nature /Nurture? (eds Barlow, G. W. & Silverberg, J.) 505–544 (Westview, Boulder, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hanken, J. & Sherman, P. W. Science 212, 351–353 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Maynard Smith, J. Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Foltz, D. W. & Schwagmeyer, P. L. Am. Nat. 133, 257–265 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. MacArthur, R. H. & Pianka, E. R. Am. Nat. 100, 603–609 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherman, P. Mate guarding as paternity insurance in Idaho ground squirrels. Nature 338, 418–420 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/338418a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/338418a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation