Skip to main content
Log in

Lateral proton conduction at lipid–water interfaces and its implications for the chemiosmotic-coupling hypothesis

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The driving force in energy-transducing membranes is now recognized to be linked to a flux of protons between membrane-bound donors and acceptors. The question of whether the proton pathway is delocalized within the two bulk aqueous phases on each side of the membrane (delocalized chemiosmotic theory1), or is localized at its surface (semi-localized hypothesis2) still remains open to discussion3,4. Using an original fluorescence monolayer technique, we have recently been able to provide direct experimental evidence that a phospholipid–water interface can act as an efficient proton conductor5,6. This observation strongly supports the semi-localized hypothesis2. In the present study, comparisons between surface potential and fluorescence measurements in monolayers provide additional evidence of a facilitated proton conduction along phospholipid–water interfaces. They suggest the existence of an induced steep surface pH gradient from a more acidic surface towards the bulk. They also show that lateral proton transfer along the surface of a biological membrane would alter the surface potential of that membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyer, P. D., Chance, B., Ernster, L., Mitchell, P., Racker, E. & Slater, E. A. Rev. Biochem. 46, 955–1026 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kell, D. B. Biochim. biophys. Acta 549, 55–99 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferguson, S. J. Biochim. biophys. Acta 811, 47–95 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haraux, F. Physiol. vég. 23, 397–410 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Teissié, J., Prats, M., Soucaille, P. & Tocanne, J. F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 82, 3217–3221 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prats, M., Tocanne, J. F. & Teissié, J. Eur. J. Biochem. 149, 663–668 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lakhdar-Ghazal, F., Tichadou, J. L. & Tocanne, J. F. Eur. J. Biochem. 134, 531–537 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tocanne, J. F., Verheij, H. M., op den Kemp, J . A. F. & van Deenen, L. L. M. Chem. Phys. Lipids 13, 389–403 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wojtczak, L. & Nalecz, M. J. Eur. J. Biochem. 94, 99–107 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haines, T. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 80, 160–164 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sacré, M. M., El Mashak, E. M. & Tocanne, J. F. Chem. Phys. Lipids 20, 305–318 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prats, M., Teissié, J. & Tocanne, JF. Lateral proton conduction at lipid–water interfaces and its implications for the chemiosmotic-coupling hypothesis. Nature 322, 756–758 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/322756a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/322756a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation