Skip to main content
Log in

Two distinct trends for cooling of the oceanic lithosphere

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Cooling and contraction of the oceanic lithosphere with age is reasonably well described by simple thermal models. Both ‘plate’ models1–4 and ‘half-space’ models5–7 give similar results up to ages of 50–70 Myr but predict quite different behaviour for sea floor depth, heat flow and other parameters in old basins. Tests of thermal models have been mainly based on topography data3,8,9 which are biased by anomalous shallow regions. Altimeter-equipped satellites offer a new type of observable quantity—geoid height data—which can also constrain lithospheric cooling models10. We present here new observational constraints on the thermal cooling models of the oceanic lithosphere, based on analysis of geoid data over the whole Pacific Ocean. We find that the data closely follow the behaviour predicted by plate models and that they suggest the existence of two distinct cooling regimes, one for sea floor ages ≲30 Myr, the other for ages >30 Myr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKenzie, D. P. J. geophys. Res. 82, 6261–6273 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sclater, J. G. & Francheteau, J. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 20, 509–542 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parsons, B. & Sclater, J. G. J. geophys. Res. 82, 803–827 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bottinga, Y. & Allégre, C. Tectonophysics 32, 9–59 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Turcotte, D. L. & Oxburgh, E. R. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 29–42 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker, R. L. & Oldenburg, D. W. Nature phys. Sci. 242, 137–139 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oldenburg, D. W. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 425–451 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, E. E. & Lister, C. R. B. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 21, 405–413 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayes, D. E. EOS 64, 170 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lister, C. R. B. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 68, 219–240 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haxby, W. F. & Turcotte, D. L. J geophys. Res. 83, 5473–5478 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons, B. & Richter, F. M. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 51, 445–450 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandwell, D. & Schubert, G. J. geophys. Res. 85, 7235–7241 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Crough, S. T. Earth planet. Sci Lett. 44, 224–230 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Detrick, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 86, 11751–11762 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sandwell, D. & Schubert, G. J. geophys. Res. 87, 3949–3958 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cazenave, A., Lago, B. & Dominh, K. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 69, 15–31 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cazenave, A., Lago, B. & Dominh, K. J. geophys. Res. 88, 1105–1118 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cazenave, A. Earth planet. Sci Lett. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cazenave, A. Two distinct trends for cooling of the oceanic lithosphere. Nature 310, 401–403 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/310401a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/310401a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation