Skip to main content
Log in

A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing use of polygraphic lie detection in the United States and United Kingdom it has become a matter of urgency to assess the accuracy and reliability of the technique. The main purpose of the present report, therefore, is to extend our earlier mock theft lie detection study1 from the laboratory to the field. Again, as in the previous study, our findings show high false-positive and false-negative rates among polygraph interpreters. These data, with their unacceptably high error rates, agree with the conclusions reached in a recent US Congress Office of Technology Assessment report2 which reviewed the scientific validity of the polygraph. Hence, we conclude that the validity and reliability of polygraphic interrogation has yet to be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szucko, J. J. & Kleinmuntz, B. Am. Psychol. 36 488–496 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation—A Technical Memorandum, OTA-TM-H-15 (Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of The United States, Washington DC, 1983).

  3. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I. & Kugelmass, S. J. appl. Psychol. 54, 409–413 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson, P. O. J. appl. Psychol. 52, 62–65 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lykken, D. T. J. appl. Psychol. 44, 258–262 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinmuntz, B., Szucko, J. A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection. Nature 308, 449–450 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/308449a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/308449a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation