Skip to main content
Log in

Origin of desert loess from some experimental observations

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

A longstanding problem of Quaternary geology has been the origin of the silty deposit known as loess. Of the many explanations for its formation and distribution1,2, the most commonly accepted is that the silt is produced by subglacial grinding processes1,3,4, followed by redistribution and deposition by the wind. The large expanses of loess in central Europe are therefore considered to be the consequence of Quaternary glaciation5. There is, however, a view6,7 that loessic silt may also originate as the product of processes in hot deserts. Some proponents of the desert loess hypothesis consider that silt-size material is the product of weathering processes7 which may include salt weathering8 or weathering down incipient cracks9. An alternative mechanism is aeolian attrition of sand grains, although, probably as a result of the experimental work of Kuenen10, Smalley and Krinsley11 consider that only fine silt (2–6 µm) is produced in large quantities by the abrasion of quartz grains. We have simulated aeolian attrition of angular quartz grains previously produced by weathering in deserts. The products of abrasion show that both coarse and fine silt sizes are produced. These findings suggest that desert aeolian processes can produce loess. We also suggest that much of this material from many deserts has been deposited in the sea but that the Chinese loess could have been produced in the Gobi desert. The finest particles produced by such attrition may be a source of silica for silcrete formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smalley, I. J. Loess: Lithology and Genesis (Dowden Hutchinson and Ross, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lill, G. O. & Smalley, I. J. Proc. geol. Ass. 89, 57–65 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smalley, I. J. J. sedim. Petrol. 36, 669–676 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smalley, I. J. & Vita-Finzi, C. J. sedim. Petrol. 38, 766–774 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smalley, I. J. & Leach, J. A. Sedim. Geol. 21, 1–26 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaalon, D. H. & Ganor, E. in SCOPE Rep. 14 (ed. Morales, C.) 187–193 (Wiley, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yaalon, D. H. & Dan, J. Z. Geomorph. 20, 91–105 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goudie, A. S., Cooke, R. U. & Doornkamp, J. C. J. Arid Envir. 2, 105–112 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Riezebos, P. A. & Van der Waals, L. Sedim. Geol. 12, 279–285 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuenen, Ph. H. J. Geol. 68, 427–449 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smalley, I. J. & Krinsley, D. H. Catena 5, 53–66 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Linde, K. & Mycielska-Dowagiallo, E. Geogr. Annl. 62 A, 171–184 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, B. J. & Whalley, W. B. Catena 8, 345–367 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Folk, R. L. J. sedim. Petrol. 52, 93–101 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moss, A. J. J. Geol. Soc. Austr. 13, 97–136 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chepil, W. S. Soil Sci. 60, 305–320 (1945).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smalley, I. J. & Cabrera, J. G. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 81, 1591–1596 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cegla, J., Buckley, T. & Smalley, I. J. Sedimentology 17, 129–134 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whalley, W. B. Geol. Mag. 111, 84–86 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marshall, J. R., Whalley, W. B. & Krinsley, D. H. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Proc. 1000 (1981).

  21. Whalley, W. B. & Smith, B. J. J. Arid Envir. 4, 21–29 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Geovanoli, R. Naturwissenschaft 69, 237–239 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Glaccum, R. A. & Prospero, J. M. Mar. Geol. 37, 295–321 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarnthein, M. & Koopman, B. in Sahara and Surrounding Seas (eds Van Zinderen Bakker Sr, E. M. & Coetzee, J. A.) 239–253 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prospero, J. M., Glaccum, R. A. & Nees, R. T. Nature 289, 570–572 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whalley, W., Marshall, J. & Smith, B. Origin of desert loess from some experimental observations. Nature 300, 433–435 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/300433a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/300433a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation