Skip to main content
Log in

Closure of membrane channels gated by glutamate receptors may be a two-step process

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Measurements of currents through individual receptor-gated ion channels using the patch clamp technique have shown that each open channel contributes a square pulse of current and has a constant conductance, and that transitions between open and closed states are rapid1. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio of patch clamp recordings of glutamate channels in locust muscle, the bandwidth of the patch clamp amplifier has usually been restricted by a low pass filter (3 dB point, nominally 1 kHz with an 18 dB per octave slope). With concentrations of L-glutamate ≤5 × 10−5 M, we previously found that frequency histograms of channel lifetimes, constructed from data recorded with a 1 kHz bandwidth, could be fitted by single exponentials using the least-squares method2,3. Mean channel lifetimes estimated from the exponentials agree reasonably well with values obtained by ‘noise’ analysis of locust neuromuscular junctions4 and with mean values calculated directly by averaging the open times of single channel events5. However, the histograms are deficient in the region 0–1 ms because of the limited high-frequency response of the recording system. We have now recorded glutamate-gated channels in locust muscle membrane with signal-to-noise ratios of 3:1 or better and a recording bandwidth of d.c. to 10 kHz, and report lifetimes as brief as 50 µs. Frequency distribution histograms constructed from data recorded at 10 kHz suggest that the lifetime of the glutamate channel in extrajunctional membrane of locust muscle is governed by at least two exponential time-dependent processes, one of which has the effect of delaying channel closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neher, E., Sakmann, B. & Steinbach, J. H. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 375, 219–228 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Patlak, J. B., Gration, K. A. F. & Usherwood, P. N. R. Nature 278, 643–645 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gration, K. A. F. & Usherwood, P. N. R. Verlautb. dt. zool. Ges. 73, 122–132 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, C. R., Cull-Candy, S. G. & Miledi, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 282, 219–242 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gration, K. A. F., Lambert, J. J., Ramsey, R. & Usherwood, P. N. R. Nature 291, 423–425 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathers, D. A. & Usherwood, P. N. R. Nature 259, 409–411 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anwyl, R. & Usherwood, P. N. R. Nature 252, 591–593 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B. & Sigworth, F. J. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 391, 85–100 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gration, K. A. F., Lambert, J. J. & Usherwood, P. N. R. J. Physiol., Lond. 310, 49P (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gration, K. A. F., Lambert, J. J. & Usherwood, P. N. R. Adv. physiol. Sci. 20, 377–383 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rang, H. P. Neurosci. Res. Prog. Bull. 11, 220–224 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dionne, V. E. J. Physiol., Lond. 310, 159–190 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Del Castillo, J. & Katz, B. J. Physiol., Lond. 125, 546–565 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz, B. & Thesleff, S. J. Physiol., Lond. 138, 63–80 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rang, H. P. & Ritter, J. M. Molec. Pharmac. 6, 357–382 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gration, K., Lambert, J., Ramsey, R. et al. Closure of membrane channels gated by glutamate receptors may be a two-step process. Nature 295, 599–601 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/295599a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/295599a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation